Mark Knibbs
2014-10-09 11:39:40 UTC
Hi,
Not much to say really...
Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs <***@clara.co.uk>
---
diff -upN linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
--- linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig 2014-10-05 20:23:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2014-10-09 12:32:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1191,9 +1191,9 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(str
sparse_lun = 0;
/*
- * If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop
+ * If less than SCSI_1_CCS, and no special lun scanning, stop
* scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug
- * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device).
+ * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CCS device).
*
* This test is broken. We might not have any device on lun0 for
* a sparselun device, and if that's the case then how would we
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to ***@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Not much to say really...
Signed-off-by: Mark Knibbs <***@clara.co.uk>
---
diff -upN linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
--- linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c.orig 2014-10-05 20:23:04.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-3.17/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c 2014-10-09 12:32:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1191,9 +1191,9 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(str
sparse_lun = 0;
/*
- * If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop
+ * If less than SCSI_1_CCS, and no special lun scanning, stop
* scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug
- * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device).
+ * (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CCS device).
*
* This test is broken. We might not have any device on lun0 for
* a sparselun device, and if that's the case then how would we
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to ***@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html